|  |  | | October 5, 2007 |  | | Susa Coffey, MD, University of California San Francisco | | Ian McNicholl, PharmD, BCPS, University of California San Francisco |  |  |
ARV Alert contains breaking information on antiretroviral drug interactions and
adverse effects. Hyperlinked titles provide more information from the HIV InSite
Database of Antiretroviral Drug Interactions. To receive the ARV Alert by email,
please subscribe to our e-mail list.  | | Nelfinavir Impurity and Potential Shortage Information |  | Susa Coffey, MD 10/05/07 Nelfinavir (Viracept) manufactured in Europe--by Roche Laboratories--was
recalled from the market in July 2007 because of high levels of ethyl
methanesulfonate (EMS), a byproduct of manufacturing. EMS is teratogenic,
mutagenic, and carcinogenic in animals. In humans, there is no evidence of birth
defects or malignancy caused by EMS. Nelfinavir manufactured in the United States-- by Pfizer--has lower levels of
EMS. However, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Pfizer issued a
"Dear Healthcare Professional" letter advising of the potential toxicity of EMS
in nelfinavir, and specified maximum EMS limits. The U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services (DHHS), as well as the FDA and Pfizer, have made
recommendations for the use of nelfinavir. These include the following:  | The individual patient should be considered
when weighing the potential risks and benefits of using nelfinavir. |  |
 | Nelfinavir should not be given to pregnant
women or to women who anticipate pregnancy, if other treatment options are
available. Pregnant women who are taking nelfinavir should change to another
antiretroviral (ARV) agent. |  |
 | Nelfinavir should not be initiated for
pediatric patients. |  |
 | For nonpregnant adults and in children who
currently are taking nelfinavir as part of an effective ARV regimen,
nelfinavir may either be continued or changed. |  |
 | Nelfinavir may be used if no alternative ARVs
are available; in this situation, the anticipated benefits of taking the
drug likely outweigh risks. |  |
|
 | | For Further Information |  | |
 | | March 26, 2007 |  |  | Entecavir in HIV/HBV Coinfected Patients
Entecavir, a guanosine analogue, is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) for treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. In
previous studies, entecavir was found to have no significant activity
against HIV, and has been recommended as a treatment for hepatitis B in
HIV/HBV coinfected patients for whom HIV treatment is not given
simultaneously.(1) A presentation at the recent 14th Conference on Retroviruses and
Opportunistic Infections and a "Dear Health Care Provider" letter from the
manufacturer of entecavir, Bristol-Myers Squibb, provide evidence that
entecavir has anti-HIV activity and may select for resistance to
antiretroviral drugs.(2,3) Researchers identified 3 HIV/HBV coinfected
patients who were not receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) and had a
decline in HIV RNA of ≥1 log10 copies/mL after starting
entecavir monotherapy. In 1 patient, the M184V resistance mutation, which
confers resistance to both lamivudine and emtricitabine, emerged during
entecavir monotherapy. The number of HIV clones with M184V mutations
increased with duration of exposure to entecavir; M184V was associated with
resistance to both lamivudine and entecavir. In vitro studies using
laboratory strains of HIV also demonstrated inhibition of HIV replication
with entecavir monotherapy. Entecavir has not been studied in HIV/HBV coinfected patients who were not
receiving effective ART. Pending further investigations, the development of
antiretroviral resistance from entecavir monotherapy cannot be ruled out,
and entecavir should be used cautiously in HIV/HBV coinfected patients who
are not on fully suppressive ART regimens. References1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected
Adults and Adolescents. October 10, 2006. 2. McMahon M, Jilek B, Brennan T, et al. The
Anti-Hepatitis B Drug Entecavir Inhibits HIV-1 Replication and Selects
HIV-1 Variants Resistant to Antiretroviral Drugs. In: Program
and abstracts of the 14th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic
Infections; February 25-28, 2007; Los Angeles. Abstract 136LB. 3. Bristol-Myers Squibb. Re:
Important Information Regarding Baraclude (entecavir) in Patients
Co-Infected with HIV and HBV. Dear Health Care Provider. [PDF]
February 2007. |  |
|
 | | |  |  | Rosuvastatin and Lopinavir/Ritonavir Many protease inhibitors alter hepatic metabolism of HMG Co-A reductase
inhibitors (statins), often resulting in significantly increased serum
statin levels. Rosuvastatin is not metabolized by cytochrome 450 3A4 and,
for this reason, was believed to have no significant interactions with
protease inhibitors. However, a study presented at the recent 14th
Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections suggests that
lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) increases serum rosuvastatin concentration.(1) This prospective drug interaction study showed a 2.1-fold increase in the
rosuvastatin area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and a 4.7-fold
increase in rosuvastatin maximum concentration (Cmax) in 15
HIV-uninfected subjects when LPV/r was added to a stable rosuvastatin
regimen. One subject developed a creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increase of
>10 times the upper limit of normal after 7 days of combined
treatment, and 3 others had less substantial CPK elevations. Surprisingly,
the effects of rosuvastatin on total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)
cholesterol appeared to be blunted when LPV/r was coadministered, despite
the increase in serum rosuvastatin levels. Lopinavir and ritonavir levels
were not affected by rosuvastatin. The mechanism for this interaction is unknown. Until further data are
available, caution must be used if rosuvastatin is to be combined with any
protease inhibitor. References1. Hoody D, Kiser JJ, Predhomme J, et al. Drug-drug
Interaction between Lopinavir/Ritonavir and Rosuvastatin. In:
Program and abstracts of the 14th Conference on Retroviruses and
Opportunistic Infections; February 25-28, 2007; Los Angeles. Abstract
564. |  |
|
|
|