Advertisement

The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Sign up for free e-mail updates!The Body en Espanol
Please Note: Due to volume considerations, not all questions can be answered. Questions most likely to be answered will be those of general interest to a broad group of visitors to this forum. Questions pertaining to a specific case; requests for diagnosis, medical advice, or second opinion; or requests for opinions about untested alternative therapies will generally not be answered.

This Forum is made possible in part by Gilead and GlaxoSmithKline.

Ask the Experts about Choosing Your Meds
Recent AnswersAsk a Question

 

Is my partner being dosed correctly?
Oct 1, 2008

My partner was diagnosed 6 weeks ago with AIDS- CD4=30, HIV= 250K. Our ID placed him on Reyataz 200 mg BID and Trizivir 60 mg BID. I can not find this dosage regimen anywhere in the literature that I have searched. I am a Radiologist (MD) and probably know just enough to ask stupid questions. I am worried about the dosage because my partner has experienced SEVERE reflux symptoms and if we could get him on on QD dosage we might get him on an acid inhibitor. The ID on hearing his symptoms placed him on a one week diflucan trial. I'm really frustrated.....HELP

Response from Dr. Young

Dear Dr. Radiologist, thanks for your post.

I'm very sorry to hear about your partner's diagnosis. I'm quite concerned about the case scenario you describe.

Who is your partner's ID? Does he or she read current US treatment guidelines?

This is an entirely unconventional drug regimen-- one without support in US, British or other national treatment guideline.

Unless there is some really odd drug resistance pattern, there's no support for using triple nucleoside + protease inhibitors (as his regimen is) for first line treatment. A two nucleoside regimen (for example, reducing the AZT+3TC+abacavir to 3TC+abacavir) would be more consistent with current opinion.

Now as to the atazanavir (Reyataz); this is dosed once-daily, 400 mg (without ritonavir) or 300 mg (with 100 mg ritonavir boosting). All current treatment guidelines recommend the use of ritonavir boosted PIs because of significant superiority over their unboosted cousins. I'd have to ask why unboosted 'taz was chosen. Moreover, if your partner has SEVERE reflux, I'd further ask why 'taz-- since there is a very significant drug interaction between acid lowering agents and this PI; other recommended PIs (like fosamprenavir (Lexiva) or lopinavir (Kaletra)) don't have this issue. In my opinion, patients who likely need acid lowering agents really shouldn't be on atazanavir, since the use of antacids can really compromise the antiviral potency of their regimen and jeopardizes the development of drug resistance.

One last point, his reflux symptoms deserves some inquiry. Most patients with very low CD4s are actually achlorhydric (no stomach acid), so acid reflux is relatively uncommon. I'd want to know if there is something else causing esophageal symptoms (ie, esophagitis). Here, in a patient with 30 CD4 cells, I'd have a low threshold to obtain a diagnostic upper endoscopy with possible biopsy.

Sounds like it's time for a really good discussion about the rationale behind your partner's doctors decision making.

Write back anytime and best of health to the two of you,

BY



Terms of Use
Please remember that this forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not engaged through this forum in rendering legal or medical advice or professional services. Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither The Body nor any sponsor is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.

Questions and messages posted to this forum are not statements of advice, opinion, or information of The Body, Body Health Resources Corporation or any sponsor of this forum. While neither The Body nor Body Health Resources Corporation regularly reviews posted content, we reserve the right to delete, move, or edit postings if we deem it appropriate under the circumstances. Visitors submitting questions remain solely responsible for the content of their messages.

Information provided by experts is general only and should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a disease, or relied upon as legal or other professional advice. This information is not a substitute for professional advice or care. If you have or suspect you may have a health or legal problem, you should consult your own health care provider or your attorney.

Copyright notice.

Advertisement